Entertainment

Court restrains EFCC from arresting, detaining, prosecuting Yahaya

Court restrains EFCC from arresting, detaining, prosecuting Yahaya Bello

A State High Court in Lokoja restrained the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) from arresting, detaining, and prosecuting former Kogi State governor Yahaya Bello.

In an unprecedented two-hour judgment on Wednesday, Justice I.A Jamil of High Court IV delivered the order in suit no HCL/68/M/2020 in Lokoja, highlighting that any violation of the fundamental human rights of the former Kogi governor is deemed null and void unless sanctioned by the Court.

“By this order, the EFCC is hereby restrained from arresting, detaining and prosecuting the applicant except as authorised by the Court.

READ ALSO  "When I was 17 years old, I stôpped hangîng out with Diddy but he looked for me and forcęd me to continue hangîng out with him again." Justin Bieber

“This is a definite order following the earlier interim injunction given,” he said.

Bello had filed a case of a breach of his fundamental human rights by the Anti-graft agency before the state High Court.

The Ex-Gov had prayed for an order restraining the EFCC from arresting, detaining and prosecuting him unjustly.

READ ALSO: Governor Ododo visits Yahaya Bello amid EFCC siege 

He sought for the enforcement of his fundamental right against the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission.

Consequently, the Court restrained the respondents from persecuting the applicant, safe only when it has a reasonable evidence upon proper investigation.

On the issue of jurisdiction as challenged by the EFCC, the judge said it had failed and so was dismissed.

READ ALSO  'Couldn't agree on terms': Tuchel confirms Bayern exit

“This honourable court has jurisdiction to entertain this application.

“Therefore, the substantive issues of fundamental human rights sought by the applicant succeeds,” the judge declared .

Speaking to newsmen shortly after the judgement, the Applicants counsels, S.A. Abbas and MS Yusuf, described the judgment as a landmark and a victory for the judiciary.

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button